As the Brexit story unfolds, more details will be known about future occupational safety and health regulations. It is therefore likely that some of the issues still uncertain at the time this magazine goes to press will be clearer in just a few days, when these pages reach you. Or not. Because if something we have learned through the Brexit process is that deferments and new scenarios have found a fertile territory in the public debate after 23 June 2016. Iris Cepero
Features
Brexit
By
on 01 March 2019
Nonetheless, Brexit Day, 29 March, approaches, so this small dossier in Safety Management is our attempt to provide some forecasts about what the occupational safety and health landscape could look like in the coming months and years.
The comments here aim not to indulge ourselves in celebration about the accomplishments of the past decades, but to assert our expectations in a post-Brexit era
Most people in the industry hope that, after Brexit, we will maintain the high standards of British occupational health and safety practices. But Brexit is a seism, the consequences of which we are yet unable to foresee; and that is why many industry leaders and experts have expressed concerns about how the imminent changes to the country’s international relations could affect workers’ rights and diminish the role that workplace health, safety and environment would have in the business agenda from 2021 on.
It is no news that the powerful and proportionate health and safety system we enjoy today is a good blend of a very British craft and 30 years of EU Directives. And that is no coincidence. Common interests, a shared mindset and strong coordination have been key in achieving it. We are leaving the European Union, but we are not leaving Europe, so as far as the mindset, the interests, the aspiration and the pride we all shared persevere, it would be easier to deal with the consequences of Brexit.
As businesses adapt to functioning outside the European bloc, there is the risk that time and money now set aside for improving workplace health and safety are diverted to meet other imperative needs. We know that despite the best examples and the best intentions, the future is uncertain, but to whatever scenario we wake up to in April, our magazine calls for preserving the powerful and proportionate workplace legislative systems and practices that have made Britain proud, and a model for many other nations.
Finally, it's important to see how institutions in health and safety see the future after Brexit. British Occupational Hygiene Society's Katherine Dearden explains the commitment of BOHS to maintain relationships with the EU in areas such as exposure limits, and the British Standards Institution offers a view for how businesses can remain resilient in uncertain times.
FEATURES
The compelling case for mandatory UKAS accreditation in asbestos surveying
By Robert Southall, Asbestos Testing and Consultancy Association (ATaC) on 02 September 2025
With recent HSE research concluding that asbestos site surveys from UKAS-accredited companies and surveyors consistently deliver higher quality results than their non-accredited counterparts, the time has arrived for the Government and HSE to introduce mandatory UKAS accreditation for all organisations providing asbestos surveying services.
Why it’s time for a new national asbestos strategy
By Campaign team, Asbestos Information CIC on 01 September 2025
A group of asbestos management organisations have developed a methodology that can more accurately identify the location and condition of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). It presents the information in simple form so building owners have a better understanding of the risk the ACMs pose. The move would also allow asbestos removal strategies to be targeted at buildings with the riskiest ACMs and the most vulnerable occupants.
For better or reverse
By Belinda Liversedge on 01 September 2025
This July, HSE prosecuted two cases in which two workers were killed by reversing HGVs. They shared striking similarities.